Jumat, 27 Maret 2009

The Haunting in Connecticut: Review

By Ted Fry (The Seattle Times)

Take note, wholesome families, here are some clues that your ramshackle house might be haunted. It's a terrific bargain because, as the landlord reluctantly tells you, it has a "history." The drab walls wail and moan like the hull of a decrepit submarine. A bunch of weird stuff has been left behind, including an iron crib and a dusty tailor's form in the attic. You wake in the dead of night to a malevolent figure standing at the foot of your bed. The giveaway that you really should "get out!" is a perfectly preserved basement room full of cobwebs, barbaric surgical tools and vintage embalming equipment.

The fresh-faced family that finds just such a home in "The Haunting in Connecticut" makes the mistake of ignoring these signs until it's almost too late. Their bad judgment is our good fortune as it leads to a few genuinely spooky chills. But despite well-designed scare shots, the laborious telling of this elaborate ghost story ultimately fizzles under the weight of too much effort.

Leading the Campbell clan are Sara and Peter (Virginia Madsen and Martin Donovan), a 40ish couple struggling with the burden of bills, a mortgage and Peter's tenuous recovery from alcoholism. Their oldest son, Matt (Kyle Gallner), is seriously ill with cancer and is in an exclusive — and expensive — trial treatment at a hospital way too far from home. The rental house they find in suburban Connecticut seems a great temporary solution, except for all its bizarre trappings.

In addition to fashioning a convincing haunted house, director Peter Cornwell stages early scenes with manipulative aplomb that nicely set a tone of supernatural dread. Madsen and Donovan are credibly pained as parents of a terminally ill child who may be hallucinating the house's paranormal history as a side effect of his debilitating therapy.

The unknowable is always more disturbing in a horror movie, so when "Haunting" starts explaining too much the scares are noticeably lessened. That said, several puzzling details are left hanging in a seriously overwrought flight to the finale.

(Continue the Trip)

Senin, 23 Maret 2009

Sorority Row: Preview

Sorority Row is an upcoming horror film which is a remake of the 1983 slasher film "The House on Sorority Row." Filming began on October 16, 2008 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania with Stewart Hendler as the director. The film is set to be released on October 2, 2009.

Plot:
Sexy college juniors CASSIDY (Briana Evigan), JESSICA (Leah Pipes), CLAIRE (Jamie Chung), ELLIE (Rumer Willis) and MEGAN (Audrina Patridge) are sorority sisters sworn to trust, secrecy and solidarity, no matter what. But their loyalty is tested when a prank at a raucous house party goes terribly wrong and Megan ends up brutally murdered. Rather than confess to the crime and risk destroying their bright futures, the girls agree to hide the bloody corpse and keep their secret forever. Fast forward one year to graduation.

As they prepare to say goodbye to the house and each other, the girls plan one last alcohol-fueled bash on Sorority Row, confident their dark secret remains buried. But does it? As the party rages in the front yard, the bedrooms and the hot tub, the girls receive cell phone videos taken the night of Megan's murder from an anonymous sender who threatens to forward the videos to the police. Then, one by one, the sisters and their unsuspecting boyfriends are stalked by an unseen killer. Has Megan returned from the dead to exact her revenge? Or was their secret discovered by someone else - someone now determined to make them pay? Trapped, the girls race to figure out which of them let their secret slip, who wants them dead, and how to fight back as the bodies pile up and their beloved sorority house explodes into flames.

(Continue the Trip)

Cold Prey II: Review

REVIEWER: FrighT MasteR (UHM)

Cold_Prey_II_posterThis is the sequel to the surprisingly decent Norwegian slasher Cold Prey, which hit US DVD shelves a couple months back. The first flick had a lot of great atmosphere and even a couple creepy scenes, but it was lacking on the action-front, which is why I didn't give it as much of a favorable review as I wanted. Now I understand why the first was all about the character development and mood -- it was basically to set things up for the sequel, which takes place immediately after the events of its predecessor. I'm sure that wasn't the intention of the two films, but that's exactly what we got. Basically what the first movie was lacking is more than made up for in this sequel.

Halloween 2 with Jason Voorhees is what I would best describe Cold Prey 2 as, because that's exactly was running through my head while watching the flick. The killer is big, brutal and wields large weapons, yet he captures some of the creepy and quiet-stalking-like qualities of Michael Myers. The story this time follows the remaining survivor of the previous film receiving aid at a small nearby hospital. After regaining consciousness, the survivor describes the events that led her there. The local police set foot to the abandoned ski lodge, where the remains of her friends lay, including the corpse of the killer.

The police bring the bodies into the hospital to confirm the girl's story and perform autopsies, but before they can get started, the body of the killer somehow begins to show signs of life. The doctors are then forced to help revive the killer to a more conscious state, which also inadvertently seals their fates. It doesn't take long before this beast of a man rises once again, grabs the nearest object, and starts offing the hospital staff. Now it's up to the remaining police and the sole survivor of the first incident to take care of this abominable mountain-man once and for all.

The flick takes about 30 minutes for the viewer to get a handle of the characters before it kicks into gear and gives nearly an hour's worth of sweet action, as the survivors attempt to avoid the mountain man and exit the hospital in time for more police to arrive. The death's are pretty bloody, but sadly there's not a lot of on-screen gore. Although there are a couple somewhat creepy scenes, a lot of the great mood and atmosphere that the first had is lost in this one. That's essentially the price you have to pay when you want a feature with lots of action elements, which in my opinion make for a more entertaining watch (depending on the story).

Slightly more backstory is revealed on the killer, but not much more than what we already know from the first. The events that unfold aren't easily predicted and some situations that these characters get into aren't entirely unrealistic. The killer also makes for an interesting hunter, laying down a couple traps for our victims to find themselves caught in, proving that he's also fairly intelligent. I also really loved the sequence towards the end when the police encounter the man alive for the first time -- very cool stuff. The ending? Luckily, unlike most horror efforts, the climax to this movie doesn't suck. Third film? Yes, please!

OVERALL

While the first film delivered a very moody and atmospheric slasher, its sequel offers us a great old-school ballsy action-oriented slasher with an intimidating and potentially iconic killer. If you thought the first movie was lacking then I'd recommend taking a look at this sequel. Worth a check, especially if you're a fan of the sub-genre.


(Continue the Trip)

Labels

  © Blogger template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP